eBillRCM
Service

Telehealth & Virtual Care Billing

Telehealth billing rules shift often. Place-of-service codes, modifiers, and payer parity rules differ by state and plan. We track those details so virtual visits are paid on par with in-person work where the plan allows — without underpayments or avoidable audit risk.

Outcomes you can expect

96%+

Telehealth claim approval rate

98%

Avg. payment vs. in-person parity

+40%

RPM/CCM enrollment lift

What's included

  • Cross-state telehealth licensure tracking
  • Audio-only versus audio-visual coding
  • Parity-law and payer policy monitoring
  • RPM and CCM billing support
  • Updates as CMS and commercial guidance changes

How it works

  1. 1

    Code mapping

    Per-payer matrix of POS, modifier, and rate by service type.

  2. 2

    Eligibility check

    Virtual benefits verified before each visit.

  3. 3

    Submit

    Claims scrubbed against the payer’s current telehealth policy.

  4. 4

    Monitor

    Regular review of CMS updates and commercial parity rules.

Virtual visits still get paid. What changed after the public health emergency is the detail: patient location, video versus audio-only, and which codes and modifiers apply. Telehealth billing goes wrong when every visit is coded the same way by habit. That habit is what auditors look for.

Clinician on a laptop conducting a telehealth video visit in a well-lit office
Each virtual claim matched to the payer’s current POS, modifier, and audio-only rules.

POS 02 vs POS 10 is a payment decision

POS 10 means the patient was at home (residence, assisted living, or temporary home such as a hotel). POS 02 means telehealth somewhere other than home — clinic, hospital, or another originating site. POS 10 generally pays the non-facility rate; POS 02 the facility rate. On a 99214, that gap is often $30–$45 by locality. Defaulting every visit to POS 10 because it pays more is an audit flag. Telehealth billing that ignores originating-site documentation invites takebacks.

Documentation that holds is one clear sentence: patient confirmed the visit from home in [city, state]. If the patient was at work, a SNF, or inpatient rehab, POS 10 is wrong. Pull a quarter of telehealth claims; if 95%+ are POS 10, you likely have default coding. Real mixes often land closer to 60/40 or 70/30.

Modifiers 95, 93, GT, and FQ

Modifier 95 marks synchronous audio-video. Modifier 93 marks audio-only. GT still appears on some commercial plans. FQ can apply for audio-only behavioral health in specific Medicare contexts. United and parts of Cigna often pay audio-only at 80–85% of video — or not at all on some CPTs. If video drops mid-visit, code the modality that dominated and note the technical reason. Compare claim modifiers to the EHR audit log; payers do. Modifier 95 on the claim with an audio-only platform log is an easy audit find.

  • Keep a per-payer matrix: allowed CPTs, POS, required modifiers, and audio-only rules.
  • Scrub claims against the payer’s current telehealth policy before the 837 goes out.
  • Track cross-state licensure: rendering provider licensed where the patient is located during the visit.
  • Review CMS and major-payer telehealth updates at least quarterly — waiting a year invites silent underpayments.

RPM, CCM, and parity are not automatic

Remote patient monitoring (99453, 99454, 99457, 99458) and chronic care management (99490 and related) have their own time, consent, and technology rules. Billing them like a simple video visit creates denials. State parity laws also do not mean every commercial plan pays 100% of in-person rates for every code. We aim for ~98% payment parity versus in-person where the plan and code qualify — and we flag plans that still discount virtual care so you can decide whether to keep offering it. RPM/CCM enrollment lift usually comes from consent and time-tracking discipline, not more marketing.

Keep virtual claims as clean as clinic claims

Same scrubbing standards apply: NCCI edits, diagnosis linkage, and complete CMS-1500/837P loops. Telehealth approval rates in the mid-90s are achievable when POS, modifier, and benefits match the visit that happened. Pair that with the same 97%+ clean-claim discipline you expect on in-clinic work. The usual risk is not intentional fraud — it is coding by template. Fix the template and the risk drops.

Common questions

Do you handle audio-only billing?

Yes — including modifier 93 / FQ rules and the reimbursement differences that vary by payer.

Ready to talk through your telehealth & virtual care billing needs?

Request a free review